Facts: On November 10, 2002, the appellant and respondent No. 3 entered into an agreement to sell 16 kanals of land for Rs. 8 lakhs, with Rs. 2.5 lakhs paid upfront and the remaining Rs. 5.5 lakhs to be paid upon execution of the sale deed by November 10, 2004. Before the sale deed could be executed, the appellant filed a suit for permanent injunction on July 21, 2003, upon learning that respondent No. 3 intended to alienate the property. Despite this, on July 28, 2003, respondent No. 3 executed a release deed in favor of his son, Harvinder Singh (respondent No. 4), who later sold the land to Mukhtiar Singh and Baljeet Singh (respondents Nos. 1-2) on June 16, 2004. The appellant filed a suit for specific performance when respondent No. 3 failed to execute the sale deed by the deadline. Respondent No. 3 claimed the agreement was signed under "misconception" and that it was fraudulently obtained. Respondents Nos. 1-2 claimed to be bona fide purchasers and sought protection under Section 41 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882. The trial court ruled in favor of the appellant, and the appellate court dismissed the appeal. However, the High Court reversed the