Intensive revision involves door-to-door verification, while summary revision mainly relies on claims and objections from citizens. Special revisions are conducted in specific circumstances, such as before major elections or after large-scale population movement.

One of the main objectives of electoral roll revision is to ensure universal adult suffrage in practice, not just in principle. Every citizen who is 18 years or older has the right to vote, but this right can only be exercised if their name appears correctly on the electoral roll. Revision allows newly eligible voters, especially young citizens, to be added. It also helps migrant workers, students, and urban residents update their details so they can vote from their place of residence.

Another important purpose of electoral roll revision is to prevent electoral fraud and malpractice. Removing duplicate entries and names of deceased persons reduces the chances of bogus voting and impersonation. Clean and updated electoral rolls increase public confidence in the electoral process and strengthen the legitimacy of election outcomes. In this sense, roll revision is not merely a technical exercise but a safeguard for democratic integrity.

In recent years, technology has played an increasing role in electoral roll revision. Online portals and mobile applications now allow voters to apply for inclusion, deletion, or correction of details from their homes. Digitisation has made the process more accessible and efficient, especially for urban voters and younger populations. Linking voter data with other government databases has also helped improve accuracy, although it has raised concerns about privacy and data protection.

The current situation shows that electoral roll revision remains a topic of public debate. On one hand, authorities emphasise the need for accuracy, transparency, and prevention of illegal voting. On the other hand, concerns have been raised about large-scale deletions, lack of proper verification, and insufficient public awareness. In some cases, genuine voters have found their names missing from the rolls, leading to criticism and legal challenges. These issues highlight the importance of careful implementation and clear communication with citizens.

Another challenge lies in balancing administrative efficiency with inclusiveness. Marginalised groups such as the poor, homeless persons, migrants, and elderly citizens often face difficulties in documentation and access. If revision processes rely too heavily on paperwork or digital tools, there is a risk of excluding these groups. Therefore, electoral authorities must ensure that revision procedures remain voter-friendly and sensitive to social realities.

In conclusion, electoral roll revision is a cornerstone of a functioning democracy. It ensures that elections are inclusive, fair, and credible by maintaining accurate voter lists. While technological advancements have improved efficiency, human oversight and transparency remain crucial. The success of electoral roll revision depends not only on administrative effort but also on public participation and trust. A balanced and inclusive approach will help ensure that every eligible citizen’s voice is heard in the democratic process.