VIJAY RAJMOHAN VS STATE REPRESENTED THROUGH INSPECTOR, CHENNAI, SC 11TH OCTOBER, 2022

VIJAY RAJMOHAN VS STATE REPRESENTED THROUGH INSPECTOR, CHENNAI, SC 11TH OCTOBER, 20222

The Supreme Court said that "there is no illegality in the action of the appointing authority, theDOPT, if it calls for, refers, and considers the opinion of the CVC before it takes its final decision on the request for sanction for prosecuting a public servant. Non-compliance with a mandatory period cannot and should not automatically lead to the quashing of criminal proceedings because the prosecution of a public servant for corruption has an element of public interest having a direct bearing on the rule of law. It must also be kept in mind that the complainant or victim has no other remedy available for judicial redressal if the criminal proceedings stand automatically quashed."