FACTS: The third respondent, father of respondents 4 and 5, initially executed a gift deed in favor of his wife in the year 2000, concerning certain property. The wife, who was the donee, passed away in 2015. Subsequently, the third respondent gifted the same property to the fourth respondent, his son, through a gift deed dated June 20, 2019, after his wife's demise. Following this gift deed, the fourth respondent's name was updated in all revenue records, confirming him as the property owner. Relying on his ownership, the fourth respondent sold the property to the present petitioner on December 19, 2019, for a specified consideration.

Two years later, the third respondent, the original donor, approached the Assistant Commissioner invoking Section 23 of the Act. The Assistant Commissioner, through the impugned order, set aside both the gift deed executed on June 20, 2019, and the subsequent sale deed executed by the son on December 19, 2019, thereby nullifying the petitioner's ownership of the property. The petitioner now seeks relief from the High Court through the present petition.